‘RAMP’-ification isn't the sole solution. Access to sexual reproductive health and family planning services for women with special needs: case studies from Uganda

Is access to sexual reproductive health and family planning services limited to reproductive needs? However, that is not the case. It is a potential matrix to check on body autonomy and other external factors influencing exercising autonomy without constraining conditions. Hence, it is a fundamental right. Historically, women and the disabled populace have been oppressed groups within the social order, resulting in the limitation of exercise rights. This paper delves deep into the causes, focusing on the factors limiting the accessibility of SRH & FP. What can be expected from the findings? This research has uniquely delved into the juxtaposition of resources and identities as well as other converting factor of resources to capitalise on for accessibility of Sexual reproductive and family planning facilities for Women with special needs from Uganda. This research has focused on the external factors categorised beyond disability as a homogenised lens. At the same time, it has concentrated on the heterogeneous individual levels’ barriers such as the category of disability, age, patriarchy, religion, and regional disparities. Moreover, support mechanisms like NGOs and family, most importantly, how access to education and finances leads to bargaining power for women with special abilities bodily rights. The thesis wraps up with policy suggestions that focus on individual-based solutions rather than a broad homogenised approach that focuses on the individual's needs that are influenced by external factors.